The Antichrist as a Ruler of Former Seleucid Territory
In the previous lesson, we carefully examined the prophetic vision in Daniel 8, giving special attention to the history of the goat.
5 And as I was considering, behold, an he goat came from the west on the face of the whole earth, and touched not the ground: and the goat had a notable horn between his eyes.
6 And he came to the ram that had two horns, which I had seen standing before the river, and ran unto him in the fury of his power.
7 And I saw him come close unto the ram, and he was moved with choler against him, and smote the ram, and brake his two horns: and there was no power in the ram to stand before him, but he cast him down to the ground, and stamped upon him: and there was none that could deliver the ram out of his hand.
8 Therefore the he goat waxed very great: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken; and for it came up four notable ones toward the four winds of heaven.
9 And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.
10 And it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them.
11 Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down.
12 And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practised, and prospered.
We showed that the goat represents the ancient Greek Empire forged from the conquests of Alexander the Great, that the four horns represent the four rulers who succeeded him and divided his empire into four parts, and that the last horn represents the future ruler of the whole world, the Antichrist. Daniel states that the last horn came forth "out of one of them" (v. 9). Doubtless one purpose of this startling prophecy is to help the world recognize the last horn—the Antichrist—when he appears on the scene. Scripture forewarns that he will arise from one of the four divisions of Alexander’s empire.
After Alexander’s death, the map of his empire was torn apart by ambitious men seeking to make kingdoms for themselves. The outlines of a new geopolitical arrangement did not finally stabilize until 301, when a league of three generals triumphed at the decisive Battle of Ipsus (1). This produced a fourfold partitioning of the empire. Cassander would rule Greece and Macedonia. Lysimachus would hold Thrace. Ptolemy Lagi would control Egypt. And Seleucus Nicator would be master of the vast remaining territory, from Asia Minor in the west to Persia in the east. Both Ptolemy and Seleucus claimed Palestine (2).
For our sake, Scripture tells us which division of Alexander's empire the Antichrist will come from. He will, in fact, come from the Seleucid division. Two different tracks of reasoning, both proceeding from disclosures in Daniel 11, converge on this conclusion.
Antiochus as a Type of the Antichrist
The Book of Daniel ignores the Syrian ruler Antiochus Epiphanes (discussed in our previous lesson) except in the final vision. There, he has a prominent place. He is the subject of Daniel 11:21-35.
21 And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
22 And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him, and shall be broken; yea, also the prince of the covenant.
23 And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
24 He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time.
25 And he shall stir up his power and his courage against the king of the south with a great army; and the king of the south shall be stirred up to battle with a very great and mighty army; but he shall not stand: for they shall forecast devices against him.
26 Yea, they that feed of the portion of his meat shall destroy him, and his army shall overflow: and many shall fall down slain.
27 And both these kings' hearts shall be to do mischief, and they shall speak lies at one table; but it shall not prosper: for yet the end shall be at the time appointed.
28 Then shall he return into his land with great riches; and his heart shall be against the holy covenant; and he shall do exploits, and return to his own land.
29 At the time appointed he shall return, and come toward the south; but it shall not be as the former, or as the latter.
30 For the ships of Chittim shall come against him: therefore he shall be grieved, and return, and have indignation against the holy covenant: so shall he do; he shall even return, and have intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant.
31 And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.
32 And such as do wickedly against the covenant shall he corrupt by flatteries: but the people that do know their God shall be strong, and do exploits.
33 And they that understand among the people shall instruct many: yet they shall fall by the sword, and by flame, by captivity, and by spoil, many days.
34 Now when they shall fall, they shall be holpen with a little help: but many shall cleave to them with flatteries.
35 And some of them of understanding shall fall, to try them, and to purge, and to make them white, even to the time of the end: because it is yet for a time appointed.
Why does the final vision put Antiochus in the spotlight? Because it wants us to see him as a forerunner and type of the Antichrist, who is the subject of the succeeding passage, verses 36-45.
36 And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds with a strange god, whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many, and shall divide the land for gain.
40 And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.
41 He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon.
42 He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape.
43 But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.
44 But tidings out of the east and out of the north shall trouble him: therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away many.
45 And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.
Three correspondences between these two figures, Antiochus and the Antichrist, are especially striking.
- They are alike in character.
- Antiochus is repeatedly portrayed as a speaker of falsehood. He would "obtain the kingdom by flatteries" (v. 21), "work deceitfully" (v. 23), "speak lies" (v. 27), and "corrupt by flatteries" (v. 32). The Antichrist will also be a liar, even like his ally Satan, who is the father of lies (John 8:44). He will promote the outrageous lie that he is the supreme god (vv. 36-37).
- Antiochus is represented as a man who deeply hated true religion as well as God's people. "His heart shall be against the holy covenant" (v. 28). Also, the Antichrist will hold God (v. 36; Dan. 7:25; 8:11) and God's people (Dan. 7:21; 8:24) in contempt.
- Like Alexander the Great and some Seleucid forerunners, Antiochus claimed to be divine. In about 169 he took the title Theos Epiphanes. Theos means "god" and Epiphanes means "become visible" or "manifest." The Antichrist will not only represent himself as divine, but will also "magnify himself above every god" (v. 36).
- They are alike in their careers.
- Both would have as his enemy the king of the south, and both would invade Egypt (concerning Antiochus, vv. 25, 29; concerning the Antichrist, vv. 40, 42-43).
- Both would enjoy dominion over Palestine (concerning Antiochus, vv. 22-24, 30-34; concerning the Antichrist, vv. 41, 45).
- Both would desecrate the sanctuary by removing the daily sacrifice and introducing "the abomination that maketh desolate" (concerning Antiochus, v. 31; concerning the Antichrist, Dan. 8:11, 9:27, 12:11).
- Both would unleash a fierce persecution of the Jews (concerning Antiochus, vv. 33-35; concerning the Antichrist, Dan. 7:21, 8:24; 12:7).
- They are alike in their names. The similarity of their names is evident enough in English, but striking in Greek. In Greek, Antiochus is "Antiokos" (3) and "Antichrist" is "Antikristos" (4). Dropping but one letter from "Antiokos" and four letters from "Antikristos" changes both names to the same seven letters in the same sequence. Thus, Antiochus is essentially a truncated form of Antichrist. Furthermore, from the title Theos Epiphanes, Antiochus retained Epiphanes as his usual epithet, giving the name Antiochus Epiphanes, which can be interpreted "Antichrist manifest," or, "Antichrist revealed" (5).
Besides highlighting the first two correspondences between Antiochus and the Antichrist, as well as suggesting the third to any reader who already knows the second ruler by his name revealed in the New Testament, the oracle encourages us in its very structure to see the Antichrist as the counterpart of Antiochus. At the dispensational gap, between verses 35 and 36, the narrative passes from one figure to the other in such a way that the shift is barely noticeable. A casual reader might assume that he was still reading about the same person.
It is obvious that in the divinely ordered scheme of history, Antiochus serves as a type of the Antichrist, revealing important information about him. It is reasonable to suppose that their similarity extends even to their place of dominion. In other words, when the Antichrist begins to play the part that prophecy assigns to the future king of the north, he will rule some or all of the territory within the ancient Seleucid kingdom of Antiochus. Antiochus’s domain was immense. In modern terms it incorporated Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel, and portions of Turkey, although it excluded Iran. Before Antiochus’s day, the Seleucids had lost Persia to the Parthians.
The King of the North
One of the most important texts for establishing the Antichrist's place of origin is the following, quoted earlier.
And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.
We have said that the immediately preceding verses (vv. 36-39), describing a coming ruler who will pretend to be the supreme god, speak of the Antichrist. We infer that the Antichrist is the antecedent of the first "him" in verse 40.
We read here about a series of conflicts. First, the king of the south attacks the Antichrist. Then the king of the north goes to war against "him." The grammatical construction permits three possible answers to the question, who are the antagonists in the second conflict? The king of the north might be the Antichrist fighting back against the king of the south; he might be a third king who brings the Antichrist under assault from another direction; or he might be a third king who strikes the king of the south. Each of the last two interpretations has had its champions among popular writers on the Book of Daniel. A common view today is that the king of the north is not the Antichrist, but the ruler of Russia, the Antichrist’s foe. For three reasons, however, we may be sure that he is none other than the Antichrist. These emerge from a close study of Daniel 11:40-45.
- The king of the north is the last "he" (in "he shall enter into the countries") in verse 40 as well as the first "he" in verse 41, and there are no grounds for supposing that the identity of the conqueror changes anywhere in the succeeding verses. Therefore, the king of the north must be the conqueror foreseen throughout the whole passage, from the first mention of this king in verse 40 through verse 45. Among his conquests will be Egypt (vv. 42–43). It makes more sense to suppose that in his invasion of Egypt he is retaliating on his own behalf—that he is responding to an attack upon himself by counterattacking—than to create any other scenario. So, the king of the north and the Antichrist must be the same person.
- The king of the north not only overruns Israel ("the glorious land"; v. 41), but also eventually builds his palace "between the seas [that is, the Mediterranean and Dead Seas] in the glorious holy mountain [that is, Mount Zion, site of the ancient Temple]" (v. 45). The clear implication that he will become the ruler of Israel shows him in the same role that prophecy elsewhere assigns to the Antichrist.
- If the king of the north is the king of Russia, why should Daniel 11 devote so much attention to a figure who is otherwise ignored in the Book of Daniel? But if he is the Antichrist, the passage merely adds detail to the prophecy earlier in the book that the Antichrist will greatly increase his domain by expanding it in three directions: toward the south, the east, and the pleasant land (Dan. 8:9). In Daniel 11, the push southward is foretold in verses 40, 42, and 43, the push eastward in verse 44 ("east" precedes "north," suggesting that the main opposition to be overcome will arise in the east), and the overthrow of Israel in verse 41.
For all these reasons we conclude that the king of the north in Daniel 11:40 is the Antichrist. Throughout the long preceding passage surveying more than a century of wars between the Seleucids and the Ptolemies, the term "king of the north" is reserved for the Seleucid king. We conclude that the future king of the north in verse 40—the one who is the Antichrist—will be a ruler of former Seleucid territory.
The Antichrist as a King of Babylon
The Book of Revelation foresees that before the Battle of Armageddon, angels will pour seven vials of wrath onto the earth, each punishing it with a grievous plague. The seventh plague strikes the great city Babylon.
And the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and great Babylon came in remembrance before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath.
The sixth plague falls on the river Euphrates.
And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared.
And the fifth plague is directed against the seat of the Beast.
And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness; and they gnawed their tongues for pain.
It is reasonable to suppose that the Beast is the main target of the last two plagues as well as the fifth—that the region of Babylon and the Euphrates feels the full brunt of the last two plagues because his seat is there. Thus, the seat of the Beast, his capital city, is probably Babylon.
The association of the Antichrist with Babylon suggests that his country of origin will be Iraq. By following this suggestion we gain support for the hypothesis that he will come from the Seleucid realm. Also, we narrow the search for his homeland to a single country.
The Antichrist as the Assyrian
Isaiah 14 is an important source of information about the Antichrist.
4 That thou shalt take up this proverb against the king of Babylon, and say, How hath the oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased!
5 The LORD hath broken the staff of the wicked, and the sceptre of the rulers.
6 He who smote the people in wrath with a continual stroke, he that ruled the nations in anger, is persecuted, and none hindereth.
7 The whole earth is at rest, and is quiet: they break forth into singing,
8 Yea, the fir trees rejoice at thee, and the cedars of Lebanon, saying, Since thou art laid down, no feller is come up against us.
9 Hell from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even all the chief ones of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations,
10 All they shall speak and say unto thee, Art thou also become weak as we? art thou become like unto us?
11 Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, and the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee.
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.
16 They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;
17 That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?
18 All the kings of the nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house,
19 But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet.
20 Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned.
21 Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.
22 For I will rise up against them, saith the LORD of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the LORD.
23 I will also make it a possession for the bittern, and pools of water: and I will sweep it with the besom of destruction, saith the LORD of hosts.
It is obvious that the core verses in this passage are a litany upon the tragic history of Satan, here called Lucifer, whose future eternal abode will be hell (vv. 12-15). But the main subject of the passage is not Satan himself. Rather, it is a man whom Satan will empower and control. Satan's human ally is called the king of Babylon (v. 4) and the ruler of the nations (v. 6). That he is none other than the future world ruler known as the Beast and the Antichrist is confirmed by his unbounded malignancy (vv. 6, 16-17). He will lay waste so many cities and wreak such damage upon the environment that vast regions will become a virtual wilderness (v. 17). He will not scruple to destroy his own land and massacre his own countrymen (vv. 20-21).
Toward the end of the chapter, without any discernible shift in subject, the prophet pronounces doom on a figure called the Assyrian.
24 The LORD of hosts hath sworn, saying, Surely as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; and as I have purposed, so shall it stand:
25 That I will break the Assyrian in my land, and upon my mountains tread him under foot: then shall his yoke depart from off them, and his burden depart from off their shoulders.
26 This is the purpose that is purposed upon the whole earth: and this is the hand that is stretched out upon all the nations.
27 For the LORD of hosts hath purposed, and who shall disannul it? and his hand is stretched out, and who shall turn it back?
The events described here have never occurred. Never in the past did a ruler of Assyria bring the whole land of Israel under his yoke, nor did God tread an Assyrian ruler underfoot on the mountains of Israel. Neither event took place when Sennacherib invaded Judah (2 Kings 19:35–36). Although he subdued most of the land, he failed to conquer Jerusalem, and although God smote dead most of his army while they were sleeping at night, the king himself survived and returned to his homeland. In Isaiah’s vision of God overcoming the Assyrian, the reference, as throughout the preceding passage, is to the Antichrist. He will indeed rule the whole land (Ezek. 21:25), and God will indeed tread him underfoot at the Battle of Armageddon (Rev. 14:19–20; 19:15).
The prophet Micah also identifies the Antichrist as the Assyrian.
2 But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.
3 Therefore will he give them up, until the time that she which travaileth hath brought forth: then the remnant of his brethren shall return unto the children of Israel.
4 And he shall stand and feed in the strength of the LORD, in the majesty of the name of the LORD his God; and they shall abide: for now shall he be great unto the ends of the earth.
5 And this man shall be the peace, when the Assyrian shall come into our land: and when he shall tread in our palaces, then shall we raise against him seven shepherds, and eight principal men.
6 And they shall waste the land of Assyria with the sword, and the land of Nimrod in the entrances thereof [this is one of several scattered prophecies that speak of warfare after Christ returns (6)]: thus shall he deliver us from the Assyrian, when he cometh into our land, and when he treadeth within our borders.
7 And the remnant of Jacob shall be in the midst of many people as a dew from the LORD, as the showers upon the grass, that tarrieth not for man, nor waiteth for the sons of men.
8 And the remnant of Jacob shall be among the Gentiles in the midst of many people as a lion among the beasts of the forest, as a young lion among the flocks of sheep: who, if he go through, both treadeth down, and teareth in pieces, and none can deliver.
Micah says that a wicked oppressor called the Assyrian will someday trample upon Israel. Who will then deliver her? The answer is, "he" (v. 6), the same man described as "ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting" (v. 2). The deliverer is obviously Christ. When will the deliverance take place? The answer is "now," after Christ is "great unto the ends of the earth" (v. 4). The prophecy looks forward to the climactic moment in history when He will descend in glory, before the eyes of the whole world and take revenge on the Antichrist and his followers (Rev. 1:7; 19:11-21). Afterward, Christ will exalt Israel above the other nations (v. 8).
Isaiah tells more about the Antichrist under the name "the Assyrian."
4 For thus hath the LORD spoken unto me, Like as the lion and the young lion roaring on his prey, when a multitude of shepherds is called forth against him, he will not be afraid of their voice, nor abase himself for the noise of them: so shall the LORD of hosts come down to fight for mount Zion, and for the hill thereof.
5 As birds flying, so will the LORD of hosts defend Jerusalem; defending also he will deliver it; and passing over he will preserve it.
6 Turn ye unto him from whom the children of Israel have deeply revolted.
7 For in that day every man shall cast away his idols of silver, and his idols of gold, which your own hands have made unto you for a sin.
8 Then shall the Assyrian fall with the sword, not of a mighty man; and the sword, not of a mean man, shall devour him: but he shall flee from the sword, and his young men shall be discomfited.
9 And he shall pass over to his strong hold for fear, and his princes shall be afraid of the ensign, saith the LORD, whose fire is in Zion, and his furnace in Jerusalem.
The prophet here envisions the Lord descending in person to defend Jerusalem. With Him will come His hosts like birds flying. Then the Assyrian will be devoured by a sword, but not by an ordinary weapon wielded by a human soldier: literally, by "a sword, not (of high) man; yea, a sword, not (of low) man" (7). In other words, it will be a supernatural weapon flourished by the Lord Himself. The only future event agreeing with this description is the Lord’s return to do battle with the Antichrist.
Isaiah also speaks of the Antichrist’s ultimate fate.
31 For through the voice of the LORD shall the Assyrian be beaten down, which smote with a rod.
32 And in every place where the grounded staff shall pass, which the LORD shall lay upon him, it shall be with tabrets and harps: and in battles of shaking will he fight with it.
33 For Tophet is ordained of old; yea, for the king it is prepared; he hath made it deep and large: the pile thereof is fire and much wood; the breath of the LORD, like a stream of brimstone, doth kindle it.
The prophet describes Tophet as a place of burning, exactly like the accursed site of the same name east of Jerusalem, where degenerate Israelites made their children pass through the fire as sacrifices to the heathen god Moloch (Jer. 7:31–32). Tophet was within the Valley of Hinnom (Jer. 7:31), which in Jesus’ day was a garbage dump continually lifting flame and smoke into the sight of people within the city. The Jews used the name of this valley in the form Gehenna to signify an abode of the wicked dead. Jesus described it as a fiery abode forever (Mark 9:43), presumably equivalent to the everlasting fire He said was originally created for the devil and his angels (Matt. 25:41). Since both Tophet and Gehenna recalled places perpetually ablaze in the same vicinity near Jerusalem, it is likely that in Biblical usage they denote the same hell. Therefore, Tophet is distinct from the hell variously known as Sheol (Hebrew), Hades (Greek), and the bottomless pit. God will keep souls in Hades only until the Last Judgment (Rev. 20:11–15). Its residents until that day will include all wicked kings throughout history. When Satan is cast down among them after his defeat at the Battle of Armageddon (Rev. 20:1–3, quoted in our commentary on Dan. 7), they will greet him with taunts.
9 Hell [Sheol (8)] from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even all the chief ones of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations,
10 All they shall speak and say unto thee, Art thou also become weak as we? art thou become like unto us? . . . .
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
Isaiah 14:9–10, 12
Two details in Isaiah’s denunciation of the Assyrian serve to identify him.
- Isaiah implies that after the Assyrian is finally smitten, he will be sent directly to Tophet. He therefore cannot be a king in antiquity, for all the kings of old are in Sheol. Yet prophecy informs us that after Christ slays the Antichrist and the false prophet, both will be immediately raised from the dead and sent to everlasting torment in the lake of fire (Rev. 19:20).
- The prophet says that Tophet has been prepared for the Assyrian, language that seems far more appropriate in reference to a principal leader of cosmic rebellion against God than for some forgotten king of the past.
Therefore, when Isaiah refers to the Assyrian king whose special destiny is to be cast into Tophet, the person he intends must be none other than the Antichrist.
We may now state as a conclusion firmly established by our examination of several texts in Isaiah and Micah that "the Assyrian" is one name the Antichrist bears in prophecy. The name does not necessarily describe an ethnic Assyrian in the modern sense, but more likely it refers to a native of territory within the boundaries of ancient Assyria. Assyrian civilization was centered in the city of Ashur, whose sphere of influence before the fall of Assyria embraced all of northern Iraq as well as regions beyond.
The Antichrist's connection with Assyria yields valuable information. It substantiates the hypothesis that he will come from the Seleucid division of Alexander's empire, for the Seleucid kingdom enclosed Assyria. Also, it narrows still more our search for his place of origin. Not only will he come from Seleucid lands, not only will he be an Iraqi, but also by birth he will be an Assyrian. Thus, it seems inescapable that Scripture points to northern Iraq as the homeland of the Antichrist.
Sometime before his attack upon the king of the south (Dan. 11:40), he will gain control over enough ancient Seleucid territory, including perhaps both Iraq and Syria, to earn the designation "king of the north." Eventually, he will make Babylon his capital city and call himself the king of Babylon.
The Dominant Historic Interpretation
The idea that the Antichrist will come from Iraq is not a fanciful concoction influenced by recent events in the Middle East, but a sound deduction from Scripture. The many modern expositors who have named Syro-Iraq as his place of origin include S. P. Tregelles, George W. Davis, Arthur W. Pink, William L. Pettingill, Arthur Petrie, and Philip R. Newell (9). Most expositors during the early centuries of the church held the same view (10).