Commentary on the First Chapter of the Book of Daniel
Lesson 2: Exile of the Four Hebrew Children

The first hurdle for scholars in Mesopotamian schools during the era of Nebuchadnezzar was to master cuneiform, the system of writing that the scribes had been using for more than a millennium. Cuneiform was extremely complex, involving five hundred separate signs (1), many of which had multiple meanings (2).

The traditional curriculum gave central place to the lore accumulated by the Sumerians, whose civilization had flourished before 2000 B.C. A typical school text that students copied and memorized presented a cuneiform list of Sumerian words (all the kinds of trees, plants, tools, garments, stone objects, or government officials, for example) together with their translations in Akkadian, the language of Babylon (3). In Daniel's day, however, when Aramaic was replacing Akkadian as the Babylonian vernacular (4), Sumerian had receded from its former prominence in scribal education. The new emphasis was upon the preservation of Akkadian. Many of the late Babylonian school texts found recently in the ruins of a temple were lists of Akkadian verbs (5). Besides sign lists and word lists, students studied moral fables, proverbs, and literary classics (such as the Epic of Creation and the Epic of Gilgamesh), as well as works on history, law (such as the ancient Code of Hammurapi), and mathematics (6). The Babylonians were proficient at solving problems in astronomy and engineering at a level comparable to modern high-school algebra. They solved them intuitively, however, without recourse to abstract equations (7). Much of what was taught in Babylonian schools would today be classified as occult science. The texts that students were required to read included many dealing with omens, astrological phenomena, or methods to combat evil spirits (8).

It is doubtful that Daniel and his friends could have become adept at reading and writing cuneiform with only a few years of training. Nor could they have learned much Sumerian. The education of a scribe normally lasted from childhood to young manhood (9). Yet in a few years, the four Hebrews could have learned enough Akkadian and enough cuneiform signs to read the standard school texts with the help of syllabaries and dictionaries. Perhaps they were permitted to read Aramaic translations in place of the originals. The likelihood that such translations would have been written on perishable materials explains why none have survived (10).

Nebuchadnezzar found the captives useful for at least three reasons (11).

  1. They served as hostages. Judah would be less likely to rebel if, in punishment, the finest of her young men, including relatives of the king, might be killed. As it turned out, Judah rebelled anyway.
  2. He wanted them to grace his court, where they would serve as a constant reminder of his great military achievements. Imagine the effect of court pageantry upon any visitor. The spectacle of princes from all the adjoining nations paying homage to Nebuchadnezzar and doing his bidding would quicken the visitor's own reverence for the king.
  3. He intended to prepare a class of royal servants who were Babylonian in their language, education, and thinking and yet who retained a good working knowledge of Jewish culture. In the future, such men might be useful in governing Judah.

The removal of Daniel and his three friends from their homeland was the distant outworking of an incident about a hundred years earlier. The king of Judah at that time was Hezekiah, a man who served God so fervently and consistently that the verdict of Scripture is,

2 Kings 18:5

After fourteen successful years on the throne, Hezekiah fell victim to a deadly sickness.

Isaiah 38:1-8

When Hezekiah pleaded with God to spare his life, the prophet Isaiah came as God's messenger and announced that the king's life would be prolonged fifteen years (verse 5). To confirm the word of the prophet, God caused the shadow of the sun to move backward on the sundial of the king (verse 8).

The sickness indeed departed from Hezekiah. Yet despite all the grace poured out upon his life, he soon fell into sin. The sin occurred when the king of Babylon sent ambassadors to congratulate Hezekiah on his recovery.

Isaiah 39:1-8

What exactly did Hezekiah do wrong? He offended God in two ways (verse 2).

  1. He failed to acknowledge God as the source of his wealth and success. He was guilty of boasting.
  2. He curried the favor of a pagan king. He sidled up to the world and sought the world's approval. Perhaps he was seeking to enhance national security by means of a political alliance with Babylon, whereas he should have trusted in God for protection.

God pronounced a twofold judgment upon Hezekiah.

  1. All the treasure accumulated by Hezekiah and his predecessors would be removed to Babylon (verse 6). Indeed, beginning in 605, the Babylonians helped themselves to the wealth of Judah. The pillage continued until the nation was left despoiled and desolate.
  2. Certain young men from his seed would be taken away to serve as eunuchs in the court of Babylon (verse 7). That they would become eunuchs is obviously part of the judgment. The word "eunuch" must therefore imply humiliation. It cannot mean "court official." The prospect that sons of a future generation would be made officials in a foreign court would not, in itself, have been greatly distasteful to Hezekiah. But the prospect that they would be disgraced by castration and made unable to perpetuate his line should have been very distasteful to him. The complacency of his response, "For there shall be peace and truth in my days," will forever be the worst stain on his record. It seems inescapable that, in fulfillment of prophecy, Daniel and his friends were actually made eunuchs.

Although these princely young men suffered for another man's sin, the reader should not feel that God was unfair to them. On the contrary, as pointed out by the prophet Jeremiah, their captivity was, in a sense, a particular blessing, for they were spared from the horrors that would soon fall upon Jerusalem (Jeremiah 24:4-10). Many of those left behind were destined to perish from starvation, pestilence, or the sword.

The fulfillment of God's judgment on Hezekiah is a fitting beginning to the Book of Daniel for two reasons.

  1. The record of this judgment, pronounced over a century earlier, shows that God controls the future, and teaches the reader to approach the prophecies of Daniel with a right attitude—with seriousness and respect, and with confidence that they will come to pass.
  2. The record of this judgment alerts the reader to several instructive contrasts between Hezekiah, the man whom God punished, and Daniel, the man whom God blessed.

The captives included Daniel and his friends Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah (verse 6). Pairing these names with their meanings will make them easier to remember.

Among the Hebrews, a man's name generally incorporated one or both of the two principal divine names: Elohim and Yahweh ("Jehovah"). El-, the first syllable of Elohim, might appear in the name either at the beginning (as in "Elijah") or at the end (as in "Daniel" and "Ezekiel"). Yah- (in English variously spelled "Je-," "-jah," or "-iah"), the first syllable of Yahweh, might also appear either at the beginning (as in "Jehu" and "Jehoshaphat") or at the end (as in "Hezekiah," "Zechariah," "Isaiah," and "Elijah").

Any remaining portion of a Hebrew name—any portion that did not point to God—was also meaningful. So, the name as a whole was a condensed thought. For example, "Ezekiel" means "God strengthens" (12). The names of Daniel and his friends express important spiritual truths.

In our culture we give scant attention to the meanings of names. As a result, few names among us fit the person. For example, my first name is Stanley, which means "stony meadow." But a stony meadow is not my birthplace, my present home, or where I long to be. Often in the Bible, however, a man's name gives a true picture of what he is like. It may tell the essence of his character. Daniel's name, meaning, "God is my judge," summarizes both his earthly conduct and his eternal standing.

  1. Throughout his life he never hesitated to do what God wanted, even though his obedience to God might incur the disapproval or wrath of men. He did not care what men thought. He only cared what God thought. So, he might say of himself, "God is my judge."
  2. God will indeed judge him. The last verse of Daniel's book speaks of him being raised at a day still future to appear before God and to receive his reward for a lifetime of faithful service (Daniel 12:13).


Footnotes

  1. Joan Oates, Babylon (London: Thames and Hudson, 1979), 151.
  2. A. Leo Oppenheim, Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964), 235-238, 244-246.
  3. Oates, 252; Oppenheim, 246-247.
  4. Edwin M. Yamauchi, "Chaldea, Chaldeans," in The New International Dictionary of Biblical Archaeology, ed. E. M. Blaiklock and R. K. Harrison (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 1983), 123; Xenophon Cyropaedia 7.5.31.
  5. D. J. Wiseman, Nebuchadrezzar and Babylon, The Schweich Lectures of the British Academy, 1983 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985), 87.
  6. Ibid., 86-89.
  7. Georges Roux, Ancient Iraq (n.p.: George Allen & Unwin, 1964; repr., Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1966), 329-333; Oates, 184-187.
  8. Wiseman, 86, 88-90, 92-93; Oates, 178-183.
  9. Oates, 152.
  10. Wiseman, 1.
  11. Ibid., 81-82; John F. Walvoord, Daniel: the Key to Prophetic Revelation (Chicago: Moody Press, 1971), 34.
  12. Francis Brown, S. R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs, The New Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon with an Appendix Containing the Biblical Aramaic (n.p., 1906; repr., Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 1979), 306.
  13. Ibid., 193.
  14. Ibid., 337.
  15. Ibid., 567.
  16. Ibid., 741.